Thanks to all the fine people who have added links to this site, pinged me, commented here, taken my money, etc., since the last time I said thanks --
BeldarBlog (the world needs more crusty, longwinded trial lawyers);
Crescat Sententia (how can I get a Posner plug?);
ethicalEsq (first agreeing to disagree, but now just agreeing);
stay of execution (quite possibly the perfect blawg);
a mad tea-party (a fine-edged wit);
Transblawg (hailing from overseas);
Tiger (now a daily read);
Walloworld (how could anyone dislike a lawyer-writer?);
Five Wasps (now with more sugar);
all-encompassing ("may cause heartburn");
the [non]billable hour (a friend from the hellhole);
GDay Mate (it's better in Australia);
Jennifer's History and Stuff (she blogs to entertain herself);
Jeremy's Weblog (I could have gone to Harvard too, if . . . ah, forget it);
democrats give conservatives indigestion (proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy);
overlawyered.com (ditto, I think);
The Mud and the Blood and the Beer (but please, not in that order);
Benefitsblog (more interesting than it sounds);
Barking Moonbat Early Warning System (I think I may be one of those);
The Slithery D (law students all seem smarter than me);
Irritable Blog Syndrome (get past the graphic, and it's great fun);
Three Years of Hell to Become the Devil (another daily read);
The Yin Blog (all law professors welcome here);
Professor Bainbridge (see above);
Ernie the Attorney (still the big enchilada);
Mother in Law (I'd have her as my own);
ambivalent imbroglio (has a visited states map too, but at least it's small);
Handakte WebLAWg (teaching me about the Google translate function);
Hold U in Contempt (any friend of Johnnie's is a friend of mine); and
Tech Law Advisor ( . . . and the last shall be first).
Now go and follow the links.

Re: ethicalEsq "now just agreeing" -- as a wise weblogger said earlier today, "my post should be limited to the facts of the case I was discussing."
Which reminds me: no wonder it takes me so darn long to write my posts -- I'm always trying to say something that includes a principle that's applicable to a broad array of circumstances.
Posted by: David Giacalone | February 09, 2004 at 09:35 AM
all too kind :)
Posted by: Alice | February 09, 2004 at 09:53 PM