IT'S HERE!

  • A NEW BOOK BY EVAN SCHAEFFER



    How to Feed a Lawyer (and Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground)

    Click on the book cover for details!

« | Main | »

November 03, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d4b53ef00d8345adeab69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference :

» Jury Finds for Merck in Second Vioxx Case from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
Merck amp; Co. won a major victory in the battle over its Vioxx painkiller Thursday when a New [Read More]

» Early comments on Humeston defense verdict from PointOfLaw Forum
One cannot draw too many conclusions from this case. As plaintiffs go, Frederick Humeston was a poor one. He had numerous health problems; he took Vioxx only intermittently for two months; and even if one assumes causation, his injury was... [Read More]

» Early comments on Humeston defense verdict from PointOfLaw Forum
One cannot draw too many conclusions from this case. As plaintiffs go, Frederick Humeston was a poor one. He had numerous health problems; he took Vioxx only intermittently for two months; and even if one assumes causation, his injury was... [Read More]

Comments

JimK

It wasn't the lawyer that won in Texas, it was whoever advised him on selecting the jury. When the Houston Chronicle published the backgrounds of all the jurors before the trial, I turned to my wife and said Merck should settle, because they've just lost the case.

There was not a single person on the Texas jury with either the education or occupational training to be able to understand the results of a scientific or medical study. For those who didn't have even have a concept of what statistical significance, other results suggested, etc. are, Merck's entire defense was meaningless babble. That left it wide open for the plaintiff's attorney to substitute emotion for facts.

Mark W

Good point on the trash talking and second guessing. Seeger is a quality attorney, has worked this case for years and was ready to represent his client. Merck just pulled out all the stops as this was a case they literally couldn't afford to lose. Lets face it, when was the last time you saw defense counsel in tears over a verdict they won? They HAD to win this. Of greater interest now is how will Merck handle multiple cases in multiple states now that the MDL is falling apart down in Louisiana vs concentrated resources that Seeger faced in NJ.

VioxxAvenger

Seeger also reportedly rebuffed Mr. Lanier's offer to help free of charge in the Humeston case.

Evan

VioxxAvenger: I've heard that rumor too but not directly from Lanier or Seeger or their offices. Was it actually "reported" somewhere?

CAvH

Looks like the coffers of the democrats stopped filling for a moment.

I'm sure the leerjetmafia that cares about "the common man" will come stronger (and more biased) back with another more illiterate jury.

mythago

That left it wide open for the plaintiff's attorney to substitute emotion for facts

Funny, but I could have sworn that the defense had a hand in selecting that jury.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo

About Evan Schaeffer

Search Beyond the Underground


Sitemeter


cc