IT'S HERE!

  • A NEW BOOK BY EVAN SCHAEFFER



    How to Feed a Lawyer (and Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground)

    Click on the book cover for details!

« | Main | »

Comments

Tom

Considering that the first trial in New Jersey lasted 8 weeks. This trial could take more than 6 months. How can a jury function like this? I'm sure that at the end of this trial, one side or the other will believe that the time between court dates will have hurt their case.

Jane

The Starr County case will be interesting. Starr County is the poorest county in Texas, and one of the poorest in the country, with probably only one or two reservation counties in South Dakota having lower per capita incomes. It's on the border, and in the absoulte middle of nowhere. Think scorpions and cactus. I'm sure Merck's Baker Botts attorneys are loving that.

Tom

Evan,
Maybe you could shed some light on how these cases get to trial. I see that the plaintiff in this case only took Vioxx for somewhere between 1 and 3 weeks. He had a heart condition and was 71 years old. I would have thought that the first cases filed would have been the best cases. People that were in relatively good health and took the drug for 18 months or better, but this is the 3rd case where the plaintiff didnt meet the criteria of what most law firms are looking for in a Vioxx case. I doubt that this case was one of the first cases filed, so my question is: Who picks these cases to be heard? The judge? The defendant? Appearantly it's not the Plaintiff's attorneys.

Evan

Tom: I have no idea. The concept of the lawyers and the judge "picking" cases for trials presupposes that there are a lot of cases massed in a single forum under a single judge, as would be the case in New Jersey, California, or the federal MDL. In other jurisdictions, the process by which a case gets to trial is determined by the litigation dynamics of the particular forum. If you file a case, in other words, it's probably going to get to trial at some point, assuming it's not dismissed for some other reason along the way. It might be true of the Texas case that no one "picked" it for trial, but just that it was filed and worked up and then one of the parties or the judge set it for trial.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo

About Evan Schaeffer

Search Beyond the Underground


Sitemeter


Archives

cc