LOOK HERE FIRST!

  • BUY MY BOOK--



    How to Feed a Lawyer (and Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground)

    Click on the book cover for details!

« | Main | »

Comments

Eh Nonymous

I saw, congratulations on being misquoted.

The article looks a lot like the original entry for "blawg" on wikipedia, which has been edited down and tightened by repeated editings. That is to say, it looks like what I wrote - which is not surprising, as we had the same assignment: write a content-free viewpointless brief piece on the word blawg, and mention the most important ones.

I must say, I was surprised by how few fact errors there were - yours is the only one I notice so far. The article looks like an extraordinarily ordinary piece of reporting - almost lazy, in fact. (Did they check with the blawgers they quote or describe - say by e-mail - to confirm that the article was accurate about them? Does the piece contribute anything new or surprising? Is there a reason to have a quote? Does anyone disagree with the consensus definition?)

That said, it was more "in-depth" than my brief wikipedia entry, now further shortened, and it's not like I'm habitually writing for a major periodical. I'm one of the pajama brigade.

Neil Wehneman

I had some "issues" (for lack of a better word) in my write-up too. I was interviewed during intro week, and I had just started the project. Hence, I didn't have much traffic. But now I'm pushing out a respectable amount of traffic (thanks in part to you Evan!) It would have been nice if Mr. Glater had updated that fact, but I don't overly fault him for that.

He also really glossed over the fact that I'm doing audio. I have very little written text on the site itself. But I also see how putting that fact in could water down his subject matter.

Oh, well. All in all I still appreciate the press and the linkage.

- Neil

Yeoman

I saw that also. Congrats on being mentioned, even though there were mistakes!

Ted

You should be thrilled with the mistake, because many more people read the corrections column than the tech page. Anybody can get mentioned in the Times--why, the Times once quoted me about whether my university should serve pork in one of its two cafeterias. But it takes a special individual whose life is complex enough to merit a correction.

David Giacalone

Evan, Sorry for the double TrackBack -- there was a delay with the auto ping, so I thought I needed to do it manually.

You're right that you have a national scope -- and, you don't discuss cases all that much. It can't be bad having Ohioans surfing over to check you out. I must confess that a lot of Eastcoasters think of the MidWest as one big blur.

Just make sure Ohio Bar Counsel doesn't try to discipline you for UPL.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo

Search Beyond the Underground


Sitemeter


Archives

cc